The email was branded "La Suite Numérique",
we updated the template to make it generic, we
will use settings env variables to customize the
email for each brand.
We want trusted external applications to be able to create documents
via the API on behalf of any user. The user may or may not pre-exist
in our database and should be notified of the document creation by
email.
Added:
- ✨(backend) annotate number of accesses
on documents in list view
- ✨(backend) allow users to mark/unmark
documents as favorite
Changed:
- 🔒️(collaboration) increase collaboration access security
- 🔨(frontend) encapsulated title to its own component
- ⚡️(backend) optimize number of queries on
document list view
- ♻️(frontend) stop to use provider with version
- 🚚(collaboration) change the websocket key name
Fixed:
- 🐛(frontend) fix initial content with collaboration
- 🐛(frontend) Fix hidden menu on Firefox
- 🐛(backend) fix sanitize problem IA
Albert send us back a malformed IA json, the
sanitize function was not able to handle it correctly.
We add a try catch on it, to not use the sanitizer if
the json.loads fails.
When an access is updated or removed, the
collaboration server is notified to reset the
access connection; by being disconnected, the
accesses will automatically reconnect by passing
by the ngnix subrequest, and so get the good
rights.
We do the same system when the document link is
updated, except here we reset every access
connection.
We need to improve security on the access to The collaboration server
We can use the same pattern as for media files leveraging the nginx
subrequest feature.
We want to use the same pattern for the websocket collaboration service
authorization as what we use for media files.
This addition comes in the next commit but doing it efficiently
required factorizing some code with the media auth view.
This is the minimal and fast search feature, while we are working on
a full text search based on opensearch. For the moment we only search
on the title of the document.
We recently allowed authenticated users to mark a document as favorite.
We were lacking the possibility for users to see only the documents
they marked as favorite.
We want to be able to limit the documents displayed on a logged-in user's
list view by the documents they created or by the documents that other
users created.
This is different from having the "owner" role on a document because this
can be acquired and even lost. What we want here is to be able to
identify documents by the user who created them so we add a new field.
On the user search API by similarity, we had a flaky test because
2 users had the same similarity score. Adding a secondary ordering
field makes ordering deterministic between users who share the same
similarity score.
The new UI will display the number of accesses on each document.
/!\ Once team accesses will be used, this will not represent the number
of people with access anymore and will have to be improved by
computing the number of people in each team.
A user can now mark/unmark documents as favorite.
This is done via a new action of the document API endpoint:
/api/v1.0/documents/{document_id}/favorite
POST to mark as favorite / DELETE to unmark
I realized most of the database queries made when getting a document
list view were to include nested accesses. This detailed information
about accesses in only necessary for the document detail view.
I introduced a specific serializer for the document list view with
less fields. For a list of 20 documents with 5 accesses, we go down
from 3x5x20= 300 queries to just 3 queries.
Add setting CRISP_WEBSITE_ID. This setting is
used to configure the Crisp chat widget.
It will be available to the conf endpoint, to
be used by the frontend.
In a Kubernetes environment, we need to whitelist the pod's IP address
to allow health checks to pass. This ensures that Kubernetes liveness and
readiness probes can access the application to verify its health.
Logs were not made to the console so it was hard to debug in k8s.
We propose a ready made logging configuration that sends everything
to the console and allow adjusting log levels with environment
variables.
"get_release" was returning NA, we fixed it by
getting the version from pyproject.toml, to do so we
use tomllib
Since tomllib is a native library from Python 3.11,
we bump the required version to 3.11 on the pyproject.toml.
The frontend need to know the collab server url,
so we need to add a new setting to the backend,
in order to expose this value to the frontend.
If the setting is not defined, the frontend current
domain will be used as the base url.
In production this setting do not need to be defined
since we have nginx capturing the ws requests,
but in development we need to define it to target
the collaboration server.
The frontend need to know the base url for the
media files, so we need to add a new setting
to the backend, in order to expose this value
to the frontend.
If the setting is not defined, the frontend current
domain will be used as the base url.
In production this setting do not need to be defined
since we have nginx capturing the media requests,
but in development we need to define it to target
the nginx server.
In some edge cases, the domain part the email addresse is
longer than the name part. Users searches by email similarity
then return a lot of unsorted results.
We can improve this by being more demanding on similarity when
the query looks like an email. Sorting results by the similarity
score is also an obvious improvement.
At the moment, we still think it is good to propose results with
a weak similarity on the name part because we want to avoid
as much as possible creating duplicate users by inviting one of
is many emails, a user who is already in our database.
Fixes 399
Added:
- 📝Contributing.md
- 🌐(frontend) add localization to editor
- ✨Public and restricted doc editable
- ✨(frontend) Add full name if available
- ✨(backend) Add view accesses ability
Changed:
- ♻️(frontend) avoid documents indexing in search engine
- ♻️(frontend) list accesses if user has abilities
- 👔(backend) doc restricted by default
Fixed:
- 🐛(backend) require right to manage document
accesses to see invitations
- 🐛(i18n) same frontend and backend language using
shared cookies
- 🐛(frontend) add default toolbar buttons
- 🐛(frontend) throttle error correctly display
Removed:
- 🔥(helm) remove infra related codes
We need this ability in the frontend to know whether we should try
to display the list of users who have document accesses. If this
ability is False (e.g for anonymous users), we should only show
the link reach and link role when clicking on the "Share" button.
Only users who have the rights to manage accesses on the document should
be allowed to see and manipulate invitations. Other users can see access
rights on the document but only when the corresponding user/team has
actually been granted access.
We added a parameter in document abilities so the frontend knows when
the logged-in user can invite another user with the owner role or not.
Added:
- ✨AI to doc editor
- ✨(backend) allow uploading more types of attachments
- ✨(frontend) add buttons to copy document to clipboard as HTML/Markdown
Changed:
- ♻️(frontend) More multi theme friendly
- ♻️ Bootstrap frontend
- ♻️ Add username in email
Fixed:
- 🛂(backend) do not duplicate user when disabled
- 🐛(frontend) invalidate queries after removing user
- 🐛(backend) Fix dysfunctional permissions on document create
- 🐛(backend) fix nginx docker container
- 🐛(frontend) fix copy paste firefox
When a user is disabled and tries to login, we
don't want the user to be duplicated,
the user should not be able to login.
Fixes#324
Work initially contributed by @qbey on:
https://github.com/numerique-gouv/people/pull/456
We created 2 new action endpoints on the document
to perform AI operations:
- POST /api/v1.0/documents/{uuid}/ai-transform
- POST /api/v1.0/documents/{uuid}/ai-translate
We want to allow users to upload files to a document, not just images.
We try to enforce coherence between the file extension and the real
mime type of its content. If a file is deemed unsafe, it is still accepted
during upload and the information is stored as metadata on the object
for display to readers.
When creating a document access, users were benefitting on the targeted
document from the highest access right they have among all documents.
This is because we forgot to filter on the document ID when retrieving
the role of the user. We improved all tests to secure this issue.
