On Chrome, when we click at the end of a line,
the cursor is placed at the beginning of the line.
We fix this behavior, now the cursor is placed
at the end of the line.
We added the `FRONTEND_URL_JSON_FOOTER` environment
variable. It will give the possibility to generate
your own footer content in the frontend.
If the variable is not set, the footer will not
be displayed.
When the user clicks on the button to create a new doc,
the button is disabled to prevent multiple clicks.
Multiple clicks on the button could create multiple docs
and create a error about duplicated paths.
Added a feature flag check to ensure the AIGroupButton is only rendered
when AI_FEATURE_ENABLED is explicitly set to "true". This prevents the
AI button from appearing when the feature is not configured or disabled.
Fixes#782
Signed-off-by: Matthias <matthias@universum.com>
We recently extract images url in the content. For this, we assume that
the document content is always in base64. We enforce this assumption by
checking if it's a valide base64 in the serializer.
When multiple tabs are open, the new service worker
can stay in the "waiting" state and not be activated
until the other tabs with the old service worker
are closed.
We fix this by forcing the other tabs to reload
the page when a new service worker is detected.
All tabs will then be reloaded and the new service
worker will be activated.
The way that collaboration server authentifies the user
has changed. We adapt the configuration to the new
way of doing it, by removing the nginx auth url,
and by adding COLLABORATION_BACKEND_BASE_URL
setting.
The way to connect to the hocuspocus server needs to be proxified in
nginx to query a dedicated route in the django application and then
follow the request to the express server with the additionnal headers.
The auth can be done in the express server by querying the backend on
the document retrieve endpoint. If the response status code is 200, the
user has access to the document, otherwise it is not the case. Then we
can check the abilities to determine what the user can do or not.
Ypy is deprecated and unmaintained. We have problem with parsing
existing documents. We replace it by pycrdt, library actively maintained
and without the issues we have with Ypy.
Every user having an access to a document, no matter its role have
access to the entire accesses list with all the user details. Only
owner or admin should be able to have the entire list, for the other
roles, they have access to the list containing only owner and
administrator with less information on the username. The email and its
id is removed
During a code review, I saw we are overriding the MP_NodeManager and
redefine the queryset filters:
- The MP_NodeManager sorts the queryset by `path` by default and it's
not done on our side, is it on purpose?
- The fact we need to redefine `readable_per_se` as a boilerplate is
surprising.
I suggest we use the Django mechanism to generate the manager from the
queryset.
The refactor made in the tree view caching the ancestors_links to not
compute them again in the document.get_abilities method lead to a bug.
If the get_abilities method is called without ancestors_links, then they
are computed on all the ancestors but not from the highest readable
ancestor for the current user. We have to compute them with this
constraint.
The idea behind wrapping choices in `lazy` function was to allow
overriding the list of languages in tests with `override_settings`.
This was causin makemigrations to keep on including the field in
migrations when it is not needed. Since we finally don't override
the LANGUAGES setting in tests, we can remove it to fix the problem.
We can't prevent document editors from copy/pasting content to from one
document to another. The problem is that copying content, will copy the
urls pointing to attachments but if we don't do anything, the reader of
the document to which the content is being pasted, may not be allowed to
access the attachment files from the original document.
Using the work from the previous commit, we can grant access to the readers
of the target document by extracting the attachment keys from the content and
adding themto the target document's "attachments" field. Before doing this,
we check that the current user can indeed access the attachment files extracted
from the content and that they are allowed to edit the current document.
We took this opportunity to refactor the way access is controlled on
media attachments. We now add the media key to a list on the document
instance each time a media is uploaded to a document. This list is
passed along when a document is duplicated, allowing us to grant
access to readers on the new document, even if they don't have or
lost access to the original document.
We also propose an option to reproduce the same access rights on the
duplicate document as what was in place on the original document.
This can be requested by passing the "with_accesses=true" option in
the query string.
The tricky point is that we need to extract attachment keys from the
existing documents and set them on the new "attachments" field that is
now used to track access rights on media files.
Migration tests should not import and use factories or models
directly from the code because they would not be in sync with
the database in the state that each state needs to test it.
Instead the migrator object passed as argument allows us to
retrieve a minimal version of the models in sync with the state
of the database that we are testing. What we get is a minimal
model and we need to simulate all the methods that we could have
on the real model and that are needed for testing.
Tests were forgotten. While writing the tests, I fixed
a few edge cases like the possibility to connect to the
collaboration server for an anonymous user.
These 2 actions had factorized code but a few iterations lead to
spaghetti code where factorized code includes "if" clauses.
Refactor abstractions so that code factorization really works.
