The Recording model is introduced to track recording lifecycle within rooms,
while maintaining strict separation of access controls between rooms and
recordings.
Recordings follow the BaseAccess pattern (similar to Documents in Impress),
providing independent access control from room permissions. This ensures that
joining a room doesn't automatically grant access to previous recordings,
allowing for more flexible permission management.
The implementation was driven by TDD, particularly for the get_abilities
function, resulting in reduced nesting levels and improved readability.
The Recording model is deliberately kept minimal to serve as a foundation for
upcoming AI features while maintaining flexibility for future extensions.
I have avoided LiveKit-specific terminology for better abstraction.
Note: Room access control remains unchanged in this commit, pending future
refactor to use BaseAccess pattern (discussed IRL with @sampaccoud).
Recent updates of dev/ruff and dev/pylint dependencies led
to new linting warnings.
Pylint 3.2.0 introduced a new check `possibly-used-before-assignment`,
which ensures variables are defined regardless of conditional statements.
Some if/else branches were missing defaults. These have been fixed.
I picked few models from Magnify to build our MVP:
- Resource:
A generic model representing any type of resource. Though currently used only by Room,
it encapsulates a meaningful business logic as an abstract model.
- Room:
The primary object we manipulate, representing a meeting room with access
and permission controls.
- ResourceAccess
Ensures relevant users have the appropriate permissions for a given room.
** What’s different from Magnify ? **
Removed group logic; it will be added later. For now, we rely on the user model's
property to get its groups via desk.
Removed any logic or method related to Jitsi or LiveKit. These servers will be integrated
in the upcomming commits.
Focus on Room-related models to maintain a minimal and functional product (KISS principle)
until we achieve product-market fit (PMF).
Creating simple public and private, permanent and temporary rooms
is sufficient for building our MVP.
The Meeting model in Magnify, which supports recurrence, should be handled by
the collaborative calendar instead.
Adapted the unit test to use Pytest, and linted all the sources using Ruff linter.
(Migrations will be squashed before releasing the MVP)
This commit introduces a boilerplate inspired by https://github.com/numerique-gouv/impress.
The code has been cleaned to remove unnecessary Impress logic and dependencies.
Changes made:
- Removed Minio, WebRTC, and create bucket from the stack.
- Removed the Next.js frontend (it will be replaced by Vite).
- Cleaned up impress-specific backend logics.
The whole stack remains functional:
- All tests pass.
- Linter checks pass.
- Agent Connexion sources are already set-up.
Why clear out the code?
To adhere to the KISS principle, we aim to maintain a minimalist codebase. Cloning Impress
allowed us to quickly inherit its code quality tools and deployment configurations for staging,
pre-production, and production environments.
What’s broken?
- The tsclient is not functional anymore.
- Some make commands need to be fixed.
- Helm sources are outdated.
- Naming across the project sources are inconsistent (impress, visio, etc.)
- CI is not configured properly.
This list might be incomplete. Let's grind it.
