It seems appropriate that backend owns the responsability of knowing any
information/configurations of the LiveKit server. Then, it shares those
with the frontend.
Please see my previous commit to understand why environment variables are
not appropriate for deployment in several remove environments.
As of today, the LiveKit server URL is the only configuration exposed
dynamically to the frontend. Thus, it doesn't justify adding a new route
to the API, responsible for exposing configurations (e.g. /configuration).
As the frontend needs to call the backend when it wants to initiate a new
webconference room, let's pass the server URL when retrieving the room's token.
It is relevant, to get both the room location and the keys to open the room in
the same call.
I prefered to be pragmatic, if the need appears any soon, I would refactor
these parts.
Introduce CRUD API endpoints for the Rooms and ResourceAccess models.
The code follows the Magnify logic, with the exception that token generation
has been removed and replaced by a TODO item with a mocked value.
Proper integration of LiveKit will be added in future commits.
With the removal of group logic, some complex query sets can be simplified.
Previously, we checked for both direct and indirect access to a room.
Indirect access meant a room was shared with a group, and the user was a
member of that group. I haven’t simplified those query set, as I preferred
isolate changes in dedicated commits.
Additionally, all previous tests are still passing, although tests related
to groups have been removed.
This commit introduces a boilerplate inspired by https://github.com/numerique-gouv/impress.
The code has been cleaned to remove unnecessary Impress logic and dependencies.
Changes made:
- Removed Minio, WebRTC, and create bucket from the stack.
- Removed the Next.js frontend (it will be replaced by Vite).
- Cleaned up impress-specific backend logics.
The whole stack remains functional:
- All tests pass.
- Linter checks pass.
- Agent Connexion sources are already set-up.
Why clear out the code?
To adhere to the KISS principle, we aim to maintain a minimalist codebase. Cloning Impress
allowed us to quickly inherit its code quality tools and deployment configurations for staging,
pre-production, and production environments.
What’s broken?
- The tsclient is not functional anymore.
- Some make commands need to be fixed.
- Helm sources are outdated.
- Naming across the project sources are inconsistent (impress, visio, etc.)
- CI is not configured properly.
This list might be incomplete. Let's grind it.
