In the UserLightSerializer we were fallbacking on a strategy to never
have a full_name or short_name empty. We use the part of the email
befire the @. We are doing the same thing now in the main
UserSerializer.
This commit add the CRUD part to manage comment lifeycle. Permissions
are relying on the Document and Comment abilities. Comment viewset
depends on the Document route and is added to the
document_related_router. Dedicated serializer and permission are
created.
In order to store the comments on a document, we created a new model
Comment. User is nullable because anonymous users can comment a Document
is this one is public with a link_role commentator.
A complete API was able to manage templates lifecycle, from the creation
to the deletion and managing accesses on them. This API is not used by
the frontend application, is not finished. A connected user can interact
with this API and lead to unwanted behavior in the interface. Refering
ot issue #1222 templates can maybe totaly remove in the future. While
it's here and used, we only keep list and retrive endpoints. The
template management can still be done in the admin interface.
Like in other abilities, we compute a set_role_to property on the
abilities. This set_role_to contains all the roles lower or equal than
the current user role. We rely on this propoerty to validate the accept
endpoint and it will be used by the front allpication to built the role
select list.
We check that the role set in a ask_for_access is not higher than the
user's role accepting the request. We prevent case where ad min will
grant a user owner in order to take control of the document. Only owner
can accept an owner role.
An invitation can be updated to change its role. The front use a PATCH
sending only the changed role, so the email is missing in the
InivtationSerializer.validate method. We have to check first if an email
is present before working on it.
The trashbin endpoint is slow. To filter documents the user has owner
access, we use a subquery to compute the roles and then filter on this
subquery. This is very slow. To improve it, we use the same way to
filter children used in the tree endpoint. First we look for all highest
ancestors the user has access on with the owner role. Then we create one
queryset filtering on all the docs starting by the given path and are
deleted.
The tree endpoint will now return a result only for owners. For other
users the endpoint still returns a 403. Also, the endpoint does look for
ancestors anymore, it only stay on the current document.
The abilities for a deleted document were too open. We want to restrict
them. Only the restore, retrieve and tree is allowed. The tree method
will need some modifications to get the right informations.
A user can be invited and no control is made on the email case. Then,
when a new user is created, we are looking if there are pending
invitation and the lookup used is case sensitive. We change it using
__iexact which is case insensitive.
When a document was restricted, the link role could
be updated from "link-configuration" and gives a
200 response, but the change did not
have any effect because of a restriction in
LinkReachChoices.
We added a validation step to ensure that the
link role can only be updated if the document
is not restricted.
Only the input data min length was checked. We also have to check the
mex length because the levenshtein dos not accept more than 254
characters and the email field has a max length of 254
This allows API users to process document content, enabling the
use of Docs as a headless CMS for instance, or any kind of document
processing. Fixes#1206.
We want to configure the throttle on all doc's viewsets. In order to
monitor them, we use the MonitoredScopedRateThrottle class and a custom
callback caputing the message in sentry at the warning level.
An editor who created a subpages should be allowed to delete it.
We change the abilities to be coherent between the creation and the
deletion.
Fixes#1193
In the UserlightSerializer, if the user has no short_name or full_name,
we have no info about the user. We decided to use the email identifier
and slugify it to have a little bit information.
On the cors_proxy endpoint, if the fetched url fails we were returning
an error 500. Instead, we log the exception and return a 400 to not
give back information to the frontend application.
The url used by the cors_proxy was not validated, other value than a
http url can be used. We use the built in URLValidator to validate it is
a valid url.
Once users have visited a document to which they have access,
they can't remove it from their list view anymore. Several
users reported that this is annoying because a document that
gets a lot of updates keeps popping up at the top of their list
view.
They want to be able to mask the document in a click. We propose
to add a "masked documents" section in the left side bar where the
masked documents can still be found.
The AI answer was activating the code block feature
in the editor, which was not desired.
The prompt for AI actions has been updated to
instruct the AI to return content directly
without wrapping it in code blocks or markdown
delimiters.
In a scenario where the first user is editing a docs without websocket
and nobody has reached the websocket server first, the y-provider
service will return a 404 and we don't handle this case in the can-edit
endpoint leading to a server error.
Children does not have accesses created for now, they inherit from their
parent for now. We have to ignore access creation while owrk on the
children accesses has not been made.
Importing the french translation broke a test
because the subject was not in english anymore.
We change the admin user language to english
to keep the subject in english.
In a first version we want to restrict the ask for access feature only
to root document. We will work on opening to all documents when iherited
permissions will be implemented.
During the multipage dev, the code base has changed a lot and rebase
after rebase it has come difficult to manage fixup commits. This commits
fix modification made that can be fixup in previous commits. The
persmission AccessPermission has been renamed in
ResourceWithAccessPermission and should be used in the
DocumentAskForAccessViewSet. A migration with the same dependency
exists, the last one is fixed. And a test didn't have removed an
abilitites.
We were returning the list of roles a user has on a document (direct
and inherited). Now that we introduced priority on roles, we are able
to determine what is the max role and return only this one.
This commit also changes the role that is returned for the restricted
reach: we now return None because the role is not relevant in this
case.
The frontend needs to know what to display on an access. The maximum
role between the access role and the role equivalent to all accesses
on the document's ancestors should be computed on the backend.
We reduce the number of options even more by treating link reach
and link role independently: link reach must be higher than its
ancestors' equivalent link reach and link role must be higher than
its ancestors' link role.
This reduces the number of possibilities but we decided to start
with the most restrictive and simple offer and extend it if we
realize it faces too many criticism instead of risking to offer
too many options that are too complex and must be reduced afterwards.
The frontend requires this information about the ancestor document
to which each access is related. We make sure it does not generate
more db queries and does not fetch useless and heavy fields from
the document like "excerpt".
There is a delay between the time the signature is issued and the
time it is checked. Although this delay is minimal, if the signature
is issued at the end of a second, both timestamps can differ of 1s.
> assert response["X-Amz-Date"] == timezone.now().strftime("%Y%m%dT%H%M%SZ")
AssertionError: assert equals failed '20250504T175307Z' '20250504T175308Z'
If root documents are guaranteed to have a owner, non-root documents
will automatically have them as owner by inheritance. We should not
require non-root documents to have their own direct owner because
this will make it difficult to manage access rights when we move
documents around or when we want to remove access rights for someone
on a document subtree... There should be as few overrides as possible.
This field is set only on the list view when all accesses for a given
document and all its ancestors are listed. It gives the highest role
among all accesses related to each document.
The latest refactoring in a445278 kept some factorizations that are
not legit anymore after the refactoring.
It is also cleaner to not make serializer choice in the list view if
the reason for this choice is related to something else b/c other
views would then use the wrong serializer and that would be a
security leak.
This commit also fixes a bug in the access rights inheritance: if a
user is allowed to see accesses on a document, he should see all
acesses related to ancestors, even the ancestors that he can not
read. This is because the access that was granted on all ancestors
also apply on the current document... so it must be displayed.
Lastly, we optimize database queries because the number of accesses
we fetch is going up with multi-pages and we were generating a lot
of useless queries.
